Change in Emergency Medical Services-Attended Out-of-Hospital Deliveries during COVID-19 in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted access to routine in-person prenatal care, potentially leading to higher risk of out-of-hospital deliveries. Unplanned out-of-hospital deliveries pose a substantial risk of morbidity and mortality for pregnant patients and newborns. Our objective was to determine the change in rate of emergency medical services (EMS)-attended out-of-hospital deliveries during the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that COVID-19-related stay-at-home orders were associated with a higher rate of out-of-hospital deliveries during the initial wave of COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted an interrupted time series analysis using the 2019 and 2020 National EMS Information System datasets. We included 9-1-1 scene activations for patients 12-50 years old with out-of-hospital deliveries who were treated and transported by EMS. We calculated the weekly rate of deliveries per 100,000 EMS emergency activations each year overall, and for each census division. The interruption modeled was the enactment of stay-at-home orders, with March 25-31 selected as when most orders had been enacted. We fit ordinary least squares regression models with Newey-West standard errors to adjust for autocorrelation, testing for a change in level and slope overall and by census division. RESULTS: A total of 10,778 out-of-hospital deliveries were included, 58% (n = 6,254) in 2020. The mean weekly rate of out-of-hospital deliveries in 2019 was 29.4 per 100,000 activations (95% CI: 28.4 to 30.4) versus 33.0 (95% CI: 31.8 to 34.1) in 2020. There was an immediate increase of 6.3 deliveries per 100,000 activations (95% CI: 3.3 to 9.3) after the week of March 25-31, with a subsequent decrease of 0.3 deliveries per 100,000 per week after (95% CI: -0.4 to -0.2). There were also statistically significant immediate increases in out-of-hospital deliveries after March 25-31 in the New England, East North Central, West South Central, and Mountain divisions. CONCLUSION: EMS-attended out-of-hospital deliveries remained rare during the COVID-19 pandemic, but there was an immediate increase during the initial wave of the pandemic with evidence of geographic variation. Large-scale disruptions in the health care system may result in increases in uncommon patient presentations to EMS.

Disparities from bedside to "webside": barriers to achieving equity in telemedicine in obstetrics.

Given the urgency of the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth was swiftly implemented in the United States and shifted from an optional to an essential modality of care. This was important in both maintaining continuity of care, especially for those with chronic illnesses, and in evaluating individuals presenting with illness or acute needs. One of the primary benefits of telemedicine is convenience; however, this is juxtaposed with the various downsides that result from a lack of physical appointments and accessible technology. Notably, there are large barriers to achieving equity for certain communities, of which the most apparent is the "digital divide" that results from a lack of adequate broadband infrastructure and lower technology literacy among members of certain communities and those in rural areas. Without attention to factors that can improve availability, uptake, and experience, disparities will increase with telemedicine. As this technology becomes common practice, it will be important to provide equal reimbursement for in-person and telehealth visits, center patient design and cultural competency in telemedicine programs, and improve broadband and technology access, ensuring that the highest-quality care is delivered to all patients.

Impact of a Hybrid Model of Prenatal Care on the Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction.

OBJECTIVE: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with poor neonatal outcomes and stillbirth, and screening via fundal height or ultrasound is routinely performed. During the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we developed a hybrid model of prenatal care which decreased the frequency of in-person visits and incorporated telemedicine visits. We sought to determine if prenatal FGR diagnoses decreased with this hybrid model compared with routine prenatal care. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton nonanomalous neonates with birth weights <10th percentile at term. The "routine care" group was consisted of those who born between April and July 2019 with in-person prenatal care, and the "hybrid care" group was consisted of those who born between April and July 2020 with both in-person and telemedicine prenatal cares at a collaborative academic practice. The primary outcome was the rate of diagnosis of small for gestational age (SGA) as defined as infant birth weight <10th percentile without a prenatal diagnosis of FGR. The secondary outcome was timing of diagnosis of FGR. RESULTS: Overall, 1,345 and 1,296 women gave birth in the routine and hybrid groups, respectively. The number of in-person prenatal care visits decreased from 15,024 in the routine period to 7,727 in the hybrid period; 3,265 telemedicine visits occurred during the hybrid period. The total number of prenatal patients remained relatively stable at 3,993 and 3,753 between periods. Third trimester ultrasounds decreased from 2,929 to 2,014 between periods. Birth weights <10 percentile occurred in 115 (8.6%) births during the routine period and 79 (6.1%) births during the hybrid period. Of 115, 44 (38.3%) cases were prenatally diagnosed with FGR in the routine versus 28 of 79 (35.4%) in the hybrid group (p = 0.76). Median gestational age at diagnosis did not vary between groups (36 vs. 37 weeks, p = 0.44). CONCLUSION: A hybrid prenatal care model did not alter the detection of FGR. Future efforts should further explore the benefits of incorporating telemedicine into prenatal care. KEY POINTS: · Telemedicine visits can provide comprehensive prenatal care.. · FGR was diagnosed equally with hybrid versus routine prenatal care.. · FGR diagnosis was not delayed with hybrid care..

SARS-CoV-2 Placentitis Associated With B.1.617.2 (Delta) Variant and Fetal Distress or Demise.

There is limited information on the specific impact of maternal infection with the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (delta) variant on pregnancy outcomes. We present 2 cases of intrauterine fetal demise and 1 case of severe fetal distress in the setting of maternal infection with delta-variant SARS-CoV-2. In all cases, fetal demise or distress occurred within 14 days of COVID-19 diagnosis. Evaluation revealed maternal viremia, high nasopharyngeal viral load, evidence of placental infection with delta-variant SARS-CoV-2, and hallmark features of SARS-CoV-2 placentitis. We suggest that delta-variant SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy warrants vigilance for placental dysfunction and fetal compromise regardless of disease severity.

Investigating Decreased Rates of Nulliparous Cesarean Deliveries during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Preventing the first cesarean delivery (CD) is important as CD rates continue to rise. During the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, quality improvement metrics at our hospital identified lower rates of CD. We sought to investigate this change and identify factors that may have contributed to the decrease. STUDY DESIGN: We compared nulliparous singleton deliveries at a large academic hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic (April through July 2020 during a statewide "stay-at-home" order) to those in the same months 1 year prior to the pandemic (April through July 2019). The primary outcome, mode of delivery, was obtained from the electronic medical record system, along with indication for CD. RESULTS: The cohort included 1,913 deliveries: 892 in 2019 and 1,021 in 2020. Patient characteristics (age, body mass index, race, ethnicity, and insurance type) did not differ between the groups. Median gestational age at delivery was the same in both groups. The CD rate decreased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with prior (28.9 vs. 33.6%; p = 0.03). There was a significant increase in the rate of labor induction (45.7 vs. 40.6%; p = 0.02), but no difference in the proportion of inductions that were elective (19.5 vs. 20.7%; p = 0.66). The rate of CD in labor was unchanged (15.9 vs. 16.3%; p = 0.82); however, more women attempted a trial of labor (87.0 vs. 82.6%; p = 0.01). Thus, the proportion of CD without a trial of labor decreased (25.1 vs. 33.0%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant decrease in CD during the COVID-19 pandemic at our hospital, driven by a decrease in CD without a trial of labor. The increased rate of attempted trial of labor suggests the presence of patient-level factors that warrant further investigation as potential targets for decreasing CD rates. Additionally, in a diverse and medically complex population, increased rates of labor induction were not associated with increased rates of CD. KEY POINTS: · Primary CD rate fell during COVID-19 pandemic.. · Decrease was driven by more women attempting labor.. · Higher rate of induction without rise in CD rate was found..